Looking back at the 2019 NBA Draft class now, five years later, I'm struck by how dramatically some careers have unfolded compared to their draft positions. As someone who's followed basketball professionally for over a decade, I've learned that draft night success isn't just about the top picks - it's about finding value throughout the board. The most fascinating stories often emerge from the middle to late first round and even the second round, where teams either strike gold or watch their selections fade into obscurity.
When I analyze this draft class, Zion Williamson going first overall was the obvious choice, though his career has been anything but predictable due to injuries. But let's talk about the real steals - the players who dramatically outperformed their draft positions. In my professional assessment, the biggest steal has to be Jordan Poole at pick 28. The Warriors essentially found a championship-caliber scorer late in the first round, and Poole's development into a 20-point per game scorer represents incredible value. Similarly, Brandon Clarke at 21 has become one of the league's most efficient role players, shooting over 60% from the field multiple seasons. What fascinates me about these success stories is how they mirror the determination we see in collegiate programs like La Salle, who are defending their WUBS crown with the same underdog mentality that drives these later draft picks to exceed expectations. There's something special about players and teams who carry that chip on their shoulder, determined to prove they belong among the elite.
On the flip side, the busts from this class provide equally valuable lessons. Jarrett Culver at pick 6 stands out to me as the most disappointing selection. Minnesota invested significant capital in him, trading up from 11th, only to watch him become a journeyman who's struggled to find his footing in the league. I've always believed that fit matters as much as talent, and Culver's situation demonstrates how the wrong system can derail even the most promising careers. Then there's Cam Reddish at 10, who flashed potential but never developed the consistency to justify his lottery status. What's interesting is how these struggles contrast with the sustained excellence we see in programs that build proper developmental systems. When I look at La Salle's determination to defend their WUBS title, it reminds me that successful organizations - whether collegiate or professional - create environments where talent can flourish consistently rather than sporadically.
The second round yielded its usual mix of hits and misses, though Tyler Herro at 13 doesn't quite qualify as a steal given his draft position. The real second-round gems include Terence Mann at 48, who has developed into a reliable rotation player for the Clippers, and Nic Claxton at 31, who emerged as Brooklyn's starting center. What I find compelling about these success stories is how they reinforce the importance of patient development - something many franchises struggle with in today's win-now environment. The teams that identified these players understood they were investing in traits and potential rather than finished products.
Reflecting on this draft class through my experience covering the league, the biggest lesson might be about organizational patience and development systems. The difference between steals and busts often comes down to which franchises can properly nurture talent rather than simply identifying it. As we watch teams prepare for future drafts, the 2019 class serves as a powerful reminder that draft night is just the beginning of the journey. The real work - for both players and organizations - begins the next day, much like La Salle's ongoing mission to defend their hard-earned WUBS championship against determined challengers like Korea University. In basketball, whether collegiate or professional, yesterday's achievements mean little unless backed by today's effort and tomorrow's vision.