Looking back at the 2022-2023 NBA regular season standings, I can't help but reflect on how team composition and veteran presence played such a crucial role in determining which teams succeeded and which fell short. As someone who's followed basketball for over two decades, I've always believed that having the right mix of young talent and experienced players makes all the difference in those grueling 82-game seasons. The reference about teams letting go of veteran players like Borboran really resonates with me - it reminds me of several NBA franchises that struggled after making similar decisions.
The Western Conference standings told a fascinating story this past season. Denver secured the top spot with an impressive 53-29 record, showing what happens when you have both superstar talent in Jokic and reliable veterans like Jeff Green. Memphis surprised everyone by grabbing the second seed at 51-31, though I personally think their lack of playoff experience might haunt them later. What really stood out to me was Sacramento's remarkable turnaround - ending their 16-year playoff drought by clinching the third seed with a 48-34 record. Having veterans like Harrison Barnes definitely helped their young core maintain consistency throughout the season.
Over in the Eastern Conference, Milwaukee dominated with the league's best record at 58-24, proving that having experienced champions like Brook Lopez matters just as much as having a superstar like Giannis. Boston followed closely at 57-25, and I've got to admit their deep roster with both young stars and seasoned players makes them my personal favorite for future championship contention. The Knicks finishing fifth with a 47-35 record surprised many, but having veterans like Derrick Rose providing leadership clearly helped their younger players develop faster than expected.
The middle of the pack in both conferences demonstrated why veteran presence matters so much. Teams like Golden State barely made the playoffs as the sixth seed despite having championship experience, while the Lakers needed a dramatic second-half surge to secure the seventh spot. I've always believed that teams underestimating veteran leadership pay the price - much like the situation described where only three old-timers remained in the group. Teams like Chicago and Toronto missed the playoffs despite having talented rosters, and I can't help but wonder if better veteran presence could have changed their fortunes.
Looking at the bottom feeders, franchises like Detroit (17-65) and San Antonio (22-60) clearly suffered from having overwhelmingly young rosters. Having covered the NBA for years, I've seen this pattern repeat itself - teams that rely too heavily on youth without proper veteran mentorship tend to struggle with consistency and closing out games. Houston's 22-60 record particularly stood out to me as evidence that talent alone isn't enough without experienced players to guide development and maintain locker room culture.
The standings ultimately revealed that the most successful teams maintained that crucial balance between emerging talent and experienced leadership. As we look toward next season, I'm particularly interested to see how teams like Oklahoma City - who surprisingly finished tenth with a 40-42 record despite being one of the youngest teams - will address their veteran needs. My prediction is that we'll see more teams recognizing the value of keeping experienced players rather than following the trend of going completely young. The teams that understand this balance will likely be the ones climbing up next season's standings.